KPI table
|
Critical Performance Indicator |
Concrete targetss ≥ 2022 |
Material aspect |
SDG |
Qualitative / Quantitative |
Actual |
Actual 2021 |
Target 2022 |
Actual |
Target 2023 onwards |
Explanation / definition |
Sources / reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BETTER |
|||||||||||
|
Financial |
|||||||||||
|
Revenue (x € bn) |
8 |
8.12 |
Quantitative |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
Income from realisation of projects (in proportion to the progress of the projects) and sales of goods (mainly homes |
Financial statements |
|||
|
Order book (x € bn) |
8 |
8.12 |
Quantitative |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
The total share of works in progress not yet completed and projects acquired but not yet in progress at reporting |
Finance & control |
|||
|
Underlying EBITDA (x € mln) |
8 |
8.12 |
Quantitative |
85 |
106 |
126 |
Underlying EBITDA is the operating result before depreciation and including the EBITDA from joint ventures, excluding |
Financial statements |
|||
|
Solvency |
8 |
8.12 |
Quantitative |
29% |
30% |
29% |
Capital base (equity plus the cumulative preference share capital) compared to total assets. |
Financial statements |
|||
|
Safety |
|||||||||||
1 |
Number of accidents: total incl. subcontractors |
1.2 |
5 |
12 |
Quantitative |
85 |
66 |
<50 |
71 |
-30% |
Total number of accidents on Heijmans projects according to SCC definitions. |
IRES |
2 |
Number of fatal accidents |
1.2 |
5 |
12 |
Quantitative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Total number of fatal accidents on Heijmans projects (including subcontractors). |
IRES |
3 |
Incident frequency (IF figure) |
1.2 |
5 |
12 |
Quantitative |
3.7 |
3.8 |
<3 |
2.7 |
<2 |
IF: number of accidents resulting in absenteeism of at least one day per million hours worked according to SCC |
IRES |
4 |
Safety ladder |
3 |
5 |
12 |
Qualitative |
External methodology applied by stichting NEN (the Royal Netherlands Standardisation Institute). |
10.1.1 Safety |
|||||
|
Risk management & process improvement |
|||||||||||
5 |
Homes delivered with zero snagging points |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
54% |
46% |
50% |
37% |
100% |
Percentage of total number of homes delivered with zero snagging items in reporting year. |
SMILE |
|
6a |
Client appreciation Rijkswaterstaat |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.5 |
NA |
NA |
Score given by RWS, consisting of a weighted average based on a methodology validated by them. |
RWS |
|
6b |
Client appreciation Rijksvastgoedbedrijf |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
> 2020 |
9.4 |
9 |
NA |
NA |
Score given by RVB, consisting of a score for the Laan op Zuid project in Rotterdam (no score in 2022 as project has been delivered) |
RVB |
|
6c |
Client appreciation Schiphol - Infra |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
> 2020 |
9 |
9 |
8.1 |
>7,5 |
Score given by SCHIPHOL, consisting of a weighted average based on a methodology validated by them. |
SCHIPHOL |
|
6d |
Client appreciation ProRail |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
7.6 |
7.8 |
8 |
7.5 |
>8,5 |
Score Score given by ProRail, consisting of a weighted average based on a methodology validated by them. |
PRORAIL |
|
6e |
Client appreciation private home buyers |
14 |
9.11 |
Quantitative |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
>7,5 |
Average score from surveys sent by Heijmans. The underlying methodology has been changed compared with last year. |
GrowPromotor |
|
7a |
Procurement spend with subcontractors with valid SCC certificate |
5 |
12 |
Quantitative |
98% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Percentage of total procurement spend with subcontractors with a valid SCC certification, excluding procurement spend on combination projects |
ESIZE/SAP |
|
7b |
Procurement spend with preferred suppliers |
12 |
12 |
Quantitative |
52% |
57% |
60% |
55% |
>55% |
Percentage of total procurement spend with preferred suppliers,excluding the category non-procurement |
ESIZE/SAP |
|
|
Quality of the organisation |
|||||||||||
9a |
Staff turnover (%) at own request |
6 |
13 |
8 |
Quantitative |
4.58% |
4.60% |
3.70% |
5.97% |
<4,0% |
The number of employees who leave on their own initiative in proportion to the average number of employees (excl. |
Workday |
11 |
Total absenteeism |
7 |
13 |
8 |
Quantitative |
4.73% |
4.66% |
<4% |
5.04% |
<4,0% |
Number of absentee days compared to available number of calendar days. Health and Safety Service guidelines for |
VerzuimSignaal |
12 |
Training costs in mln (total) |
13 |
8 |
Quantitative |
2.9 |
2.9 |
NA |
4.9 |
NA |
Training costs according to registration Heijmans Academy. |
SAP |
|
13 |
Employee engagement 2022 > 2019 |
8 |
13 |
8 |
Quantitative |
+25 NPS |
> benchmark |
The eNPS (e stands for employee) shows to what extent employees are ambassadors for their employer. This asks the question "How likely are you to recommend Heijmans as a good employer to others?". |
2DaysMood |
|||
14 |
Diversity: % women |
16 |
8 |
Quantitative |
12.90% |
13.90% |
>14% |
14.30% |
>14% |
The percentage of women in proportion to the total number of employees (excl. interns) on the final day of the |
Workday |
|
|
SMARTER |
|||||||||||
18 |
Spending on innovation (x mln) |
9 |
9 |
Quantitative |
10.4 |
8.3 |
NA |
12.6 |
NA |
Spending on innovation group and business areas in € mln. |
SAP |
|
|
Digitalisation |
|||||||||||
20 |
New data-driven services successfully launched in the market |
10 |
Quantitative |
4 |
9 |
>10 |
17 |
>10 |
Number of data-driven services successfully launched in the market. |
Finance & control |
||
21 |
Number of subscriptions based on |
11 |
Quantitative |
727 |
>700 |
Provided by Infra |
||||||
|
Production technology |
|||||||||||
22a |
Concept homes - delivered |
12 |
9.12 |
9 |
Quantitative |
846 |
613 |
>650 |
776 |
>750 |
Number of concept homes delivered |
Concept team |
25 |
Hours shifted from on-site to off-site (%) |
12 |
Qualitative |
Indicator in development. |
10.2.2 Production technology |
|||||||
|
SUSTAINABLE |
|||||||||||
|
Energy |
|||||||||||
26 |
Absolute CO2 emissions scope 1+2 + business kilometres + air travel |
13 |
1,2,6 |
7.11 |
Quantitative |
42,507 |
27,995 |
<22.000 |
26,082 |
<23,500 |
SKAO CO2 performance ladder, GHG protocol. In tonnes CO2. |
SAP |
27 |
Average CO2 emissions of homes delivered |
15 |
1.2 |
7.11 |
Quantitative |
1,409 |
1,021 |
<1.021 |
932 |
<450 |
Average CO2 emission of homes delivered in 2020. In kilogrammes CO2. |
EPC and BENG software |
|
Materials |
|||||||||||
33 |
Total amount residual materials |
18 |
3 |
11 |
Quantitative |
24,915 |
25,197 |
<24.000 |
19,004 |
ENCORD Construction Waste Measurement Guide for definitiions (including operational waste, no excavations), |
Provided by waste processors |
|
34 |
Separation of residual materials at building sites |
18 |
3 |
11 |
Quantitative |
71% |
81% |
>75% |
74% |
> 75% |
ENCORD Construction Waste Measurement Guide (including operational waste, no excavations ), |
Provided by waste processors |
35 |
Reuse residual materials after transport |
18 |
3 |
11 |
Quantitative |
89% |
88% |
>90% |
90% |
> 90% |
Sustainable reuse is defined as raw material for the generation of green energy. On the basis of waste profile Renewi; |
Provided by waste processors |
36 |
Procurement spend with preferred suppliers with signed sustainability statement |
7,11,12 |
12 |
Quantitative |
93% |
96% |
100% |
95% |
100% |
Percentage of total procurement spend with preferred suppliers with a framework contract and a signed sustainability |
ESIZE |
|
38 |
Packaging that can be reused or recycled |
17 |
3 |
11.12 |
Qualitative |
10.3.2 Materials |
||||||
39a |
CPG-score GGB homes - concept homes |
18 |
3 |
11.12 |
Quantitative |
7.8 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
NA |
CPG score GGB homes - concept homes (1-10). |
10.3.2 Materials |
39b |
CPG score GGB homes - non-concept homes |
18 |
3 |
11.12 |
Quantitative |
7 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
NA |
CPG score GGB homes - non-concept homes (1-10). |
10.3.2 Materials |
40 |
Asphalt recycling |
19 |
3 |
11.12 |
Quantitative |
60% |
67% |
70% |
70% |
The technically feasible share of recycled asphalt in the total asphalt. Target is to be able to produce asphalt that |
10.3.2 Materials |
|
41 |
Concrete recycling |
19 |
3 |
11.12 |
Quantitative |
30% |
75% |
75% |
80% |
The technically feasible share of recycled concrete in the total concrete. The target is to be able to produce concrete |
10.3.2 Materials |
|
42 |
Heijmans Raw materials & Materials: Transaction volume traded via Matching Materials (€ K) |
3 |
11.12 |
Qualitative |
10.3.2 Materials |
|||||||
|
Space |
|||||||||||
43 |
Area developments with Greenlabel A or B |
20 |
2.4 |
11 |
Quantitative |
NA |
0% |
NA |
100% |
All our own developments in the design or realisation phase (and where we are part of the area operation) have NL Greenlabel/Site Label A or B. |
||
44 |
Projects in which climate adaptation and biodiversity initiatives have been applied (#) |
21 |
2.4 |
11 |
Quantitative |
10 |
19 |
>19 |
22 |
Projects that involve the application of one or more initiatives that add value to biodiversity or climate adaptation. |
||
45 |
Climate adaptation and biodiversity propositions that have been developed and will be applied (#) |
21 |
2.4 |
11 |
Quantitative |
NA |
2 |
Number of propositions that include the development of climate adapation and biodiversity initiatives |
||||
46 |
Showcases - minimum of three per year right across the entire company |
22 |
9.12 |
11 |
Quantitative |
NA |
5 |
Number of new showcases in the field of KAN. |
||||
|
Other |
|||||||||||
|
Score transparency benchmark |
11 |
12 |
Quantitative |
12 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Ranking in the transparency benchmark of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate. |
Ministry website |
||
|
% sustainable timber used |
16 |
3 |
9 |
Quantitative |
98.70% |
99.80% |
99.80% |
99.80% |
Percentage of sustainably certified timber (FSC/PEFC) in relation to the total timber purchased according to supplier |
Procurement spend |
Explanation KPI table:
Since 2018, Heijmans has used EBITDA as the definition of result.
Safety: the IF figures include combined projects calculated pro rata.
Client satisfaction: the Ministry of Public Works and Waterways has adjusted its methodology for measuring satisfaction, so we have not included a result in the annual report for this client.
CO2 measurement: Heijmans applies the conversion factors taken from the CO2emissiefactoren.nl website.
CO2 measurement: to measure and report on CO2 emissions, Heijmans uses the division into scopes of the Green House Gas (GHG) protocol. Scope 1 covers the emissions from fuels we purchase and consume ourselves (mainly gas, petrol and diesel). Scope 2 covers CO2 emissions resulting from the use of electricity (we do not cause these CO2 emissions, as they are generated by the power company). Scope 3 covers the CO2 emissions from homes delivered. This only includes projects where Heijmans was also the client, and so can determine the ambition level.
In 2021, the Dutch government introduced new amended legislation (BENG). Both EPC and BENG can be converted to the same indicator (average CO2 emissions of the delivered home), guaranteeing continuity in measurements.
CO2 measurement: the CO2 emissions amounted to 26,082 tonnes, (25,925 of which in scope 1 and 157 of which in scope 2 (incl. business travel kilometres and air travel kilometres)). This includes part compensation for the electricity purchased through the purchase of certificates. Without compensation, emissions would have amounted to 32,161 tonnes.
Waste: the amount of residual material reported result from residual material processors. This pertains to the period from January 2022 through November 2022. The December figures have been estimated, as in previous years.
Waste: the total amount of residual material is a material aspect and is therefore reported in the annual report. It has proven impossible to link this with concrete reduction targets in recent years, due to the high level of dependence on the nature of the projects offered (including or excluding demolition). Via its activities in the field of LEAN design and circular construction, Heijmans does target the minimisation of waste and high-grade processing of residual material flows in the design phase. Heijmans also actively targets the reduction of the amount of packaging materials.
Heijmans has participated in the development of the NL Greenlabel instrument right from the start. Throughout the development, the instrument has gained nuance (not just the area label, but also the site label differentiate in the various development phases of an area), and the measuring method and KPIs have been adjusted.